The sanctuary "market"
"The market is already regulating" – the mantra of the market economy and its representatives. It is always paid us again and again and we know it’s right. The market is already regulating. We know pretty much as he works and what he is. No one should be in question. "The market is already regulating." what "the market" is, we know exactly. Only what "it" is that he regulates that nobody said us.
This is not a pladoyer dafur to introduce a planned economy according to the model of the former real existing socialism. Solely the duty to say this to avoid a discussion war already shows that the market is considered sanctuary. Criticism of the market is criticism at the existing system, which has existed for decades, the "communism" has survived and therefore already with many already a unique to change. But even the losers of this strategy often belong to the defenders of the traditional.
Indeed! The market is infallible when it comes to, "it" rule. Apparently, not a discussion about the market is necessary, but first about "it": what do we want that the market regulates? Is "it" the worry of that all people are well? Peace, security, reason and joy? Or is "it" Z.B. The exclusion of millions that are overflowed, since the sanctuary "labour market" she no longer needs? And the overtime hours and the prere to which the millions are exposed, the work? The rising social uncertainty and poverty – and though we produce more thanks to its up-to-date economic growth than the year before! Let us remember that at all? If NO: yes, where is it what we produce more than last year?
Unemployment vs. Uneasiness
Unemployment is not really the problem. How many people go to their work happy and motivated? The few people want to work. Working is nowadays much more social duty to survive, as the desire to start something useful with his time. Unemployment is not the problem. The problem is the problem! And the lack of alternatives that one spends his time.
What today’s market can:
- Good produce that are needed
- Bring well where they are needed and the usual money is available
- Demand innovation, as the one is rewarded, which satisfies the demand in the market
What today’s market can not:
- Good producing, which are needed, but no short-term, cash in cash ejectable returns (kindergarten! Freetime activities! Education!To)
- Bring well where they are needed, but where no money is there (hunger in the developing courses, overproduction in the industrialized nations)
- Call innovations that benefit from society as a whole (keyword environmental protection)
The market follows laws.
Basically, these laws do not differ from those of a computer system. You can handle some, others can break. Do you understand?
Morpheus to neo in the movie "matrix"
The market follows its own rules, but these rules are bound to legality. And many of these laws are made by humans. A clear example of this is the change in copyright. In the US, copyright has just been reduced to up to 95 years – thus Z.B. Walt disney remains solely entitled to the use of the original picture of mickey mouse. The copyright industry is massively against exchange bolts like kazaa.
Although the market ensures that information about these networks are free and quickly available, the effort of individual (the company) is made on the well-being of humanity. If you have been freely installed the market at this point, as is required by the hard representatives again and again, then the variant was clearly the variant "swap" win – because it ensures a fast, decentralized, optimal distribution of information – and demand is obviously roughly.
Here, it is apparently intervened in the legality of the market to form the market so that he "it" regulate.
Market laws are broken
Already with the establishment of a cartel or even a monopoly, many market laws are no longer valued – they are bypassed and the resulting opportunities are also rarely used to use humanity throughout. "Anti-cartel" are those who are to be careful not to make the market at these "out of control" runs.
But depending on what goal "it" is that we are running behind, you should abolish this limitation right now. So if the aim is to raise the free market for the top and most important goal, then one must consistently fall this artificial barriers – cost it, which wool.
The german chancellor schroder has now be "reform package" (see. The mild courage to improve). The opposition criticizes it. Her better proposals were probably still greater social sector shortness than the "social democratic" government has made. What to forget all? That "the market" A symbiosis between providers and demand is. The providers can produce as long as they want – if the buyers are not involved in the production process and no part of the resulting "value added" get away, then you have no money to buy the products. A fixation of rationalization only to the fact that alone the "conditions for companies get better" and the demand for work slaves has to go into a situation in a situation, which can not be desirable.
"The market plays crafted"
A statement that is repeatedly hort – especially when it comes to reactions of stock markets. Meanwhile, it has spoken around that the market consists of more than mathematics and utility functions. But at speed that findings are implemented in actions nowadays, they have to burrow not to be able to experience a change. The statement "the market plays" also shows that marketing alone does not transfer social control. The times when crinted us should be slowly over.
What is missing the market is the social component
Market regulation must be if "it" the goal should be to use humanity. Today’s market is designed to solve individual problems. It is completely overlooking that every individual is part of the company – and only if the company is fine, the individual can also live carefree. Today’s market fails, for example, almost complete when it comes to environmental concerns. Environmental desk has been aware of a known problem for decades. The market alone regulates nothing to the better, since he only rewards, which is financially measurable. Since the laws have to be created, such as those for the collection of a mineral tax, to educate the industry for the production of exhaust gasemic vehicles and consumers to consciously handling the car as means of transport.
The example offers auto social rationalization possibilities. In germany has approx. Every second one car. Most of them are at least 22 hours a day gammling in the area, take place away, claim resources and are often more status symbol as a means of use.
Imagine inner towns, which are accessible only by taxes and public transport, – of course of so many that you never waited for 3 minutes somewhere in the city to be taken to be taken. Cars for that are already there enough, unemployed people who could make good money as often used taxi drivers, as well. By mobile phone a requirement of a taxis could happen at the push of a button, thanks to GPS the taxi driver immediately knew where he has to go. Developments like paybox were able to ensure that the phone can still be paid with the phone. In this way, hundreds of people were sharing a car and the associated costs. The market makes "it" possibly – if you are ready to create the framework conditions for it and find someone who coordinates such a thing.
- Missing traffic jams provide even time savings, lower environmental impact, better strain transmission
- The individual only pays for what he uses (the dangerous time or or. Kilometers) instead of investing a lot of money into a car, which stands around 90% of his time. The cost of purchasing, attitude and operation of the car were allowed to be many times higher than the cost of the day taxi rides in good utilization of existing taxi resources. Today’s taxi tours are also so high because too few people drive taxi. Here the market could do good work.
- As a result, financial savings of the previous car drivers – this could be z.B. Be compensated by lower working hours
- We needed fewer cars, but had – socially seen – the same benefits. That is the fact that the work of thousands of workers in autofactics is not needed socially. They were able to drive instead of overflowing automobiles, and thus to drive the environmental destruction, for example, act as taxi drivers or continue to develop – it must only be ensured that social savings benefit them and they are not victims of this rationalization. Yes, the horror word "redistribution" must fall at this point!
This transport system can be extended by rough car rental parks, which can be used for vacation travel and other trips where real individual traffic is to be used to be incoming. These are only mental stitchpoints that can be extended, changed or prevented! Depending on what "it" is what humanity wants.
The discussions about such a proposal was allowed to get married: name no one wants to do without his individual advantage. The car is the symbol for individuality. But we will need it sometime! Or who explains the 1 billion chinese that everyone can have a car in china, but not – as the earth does not even provide enough resources to make as many cars. From the OL to operate the car and the place to stop you, not to mention.
This is an example of the possible optimization of social excursions. There are many more (million unemployed but millions of overtime; subsidizing the coal balance rather than demands of renewable energies; agricultural subsidies in europe instead of collaboration with agricultural agents of other continents; progressive redistribution of arm to rich;…To). To recognize them and to find solutions, but you have to think a little long-term thinking and action than just until the end of a year. The market can help very well, but alone he is unable to tackle such problems. If someone wants to tackle the ruling social problems…
The market is already regulating!
The market should be again considered what he is: a tool. However, the current political and economic discussion will always be for the self-purpose. Everything for the market, nothing for the people. How long does that go?? In order to bring about changes, it is important that thinking with the globalization of the market pace stop: global thinking in global periods and non-stage holding on over-resident dogmas. And one should be prepared to think again once made decisions in regular periods – before mistakes and other framework conditions is finally no one.